Mainstream News Outlet Confuses “Sex” and “Stuck His Dick Into”

by FCM

its a common error.  and they made it more than once.  liberal dickwad/mainstream news outlet huffington post reports that a man has been arrested for having “sex” with his neighbors pink inflatable swimming pool raft.  sex, you say?  yep.  later, the same publication reports that a new mexico police officer has been fired for having the “sex” with a woman on the hood of his patrol car.  a security camera that just happened to be there shows that the officer is still in his uniform, but little else has been made public.  we dont know the identity of the woman, or all of the circumstances of this encounter, although the facts we do have certainly do not rule out the possibility of sexual abuse and abuse of power by a police officer, otherwise known as rape.  but apparently, as long as a man sticks his dick into something, anything, under any circumstances, huffington post is willing to call it “sex”.  got that?  good.

not to single out huff po by any means: indeed, msnbc has done the same fucking thing.  repeatedly.  so has cnn.  when reporting on the jaycee dugard case, where a now-adult woman had been kidnapped as a child and held captive for 20 years and subjected to repeated rapes, msnbc reported that she had been subjected to “long drug-fueled sex-sessions.”  sex?  really?  in another article, msnbc reports on “sex slavery” where female victims of human trafficking were subjected to “forced prostitution” and made to endure being vaginally penetrated by over 100 men per day under conditions literally amounting to slavery: it never says the “rape” word one time.  not once.  they do repeatedly use the word “sex”.  as in sexual slaves, sexual slavery, and sex trafficking.  but from whose perspective is any of this “sex”?  this is a serious question.

like huff po, apparently what msnbc means when it says “sex” is “a man stuck his dick into”.  there is no other reasonable interpretation of their use of this word.

and cnn does the same damn thing: even its lofty-sounding “freedom project to end modern-day slavery” says “sex trafficking” when it means men who deal in the commodity of rape.  of men sticking their dicks into women under conditions amounting to slavery, which is obviously rape.  really, it cannot get more obvious.  this is the holy grail of obviousness, yet cnn sees “sex” here, and not rape.  which is terrifying, because this probably means that cnn does not believe that rape exists.  if not here, where?  this is a serious question.

and cnn says “forced prostitution” when referring to rape, and repeated rape, of enslaved women and underage girls too.

“forced prostitution” of underage girls.  can we think about this one for a minute?  what is cnn saying here: that prostitution is okay, as long as its not “forced”?  clearly, this is exactly what they are saying, being that they are the liberal dickwad/mainstream media and all.  prostitution is fine as long as its “consensual” just like (presumably) PIV is completely harmless when its “consensual”.  its pro-pornstitution PIV-positivism!  but when speaking of the forced prostitution of underage girls there is an element missing isnt there?  namely, that sticking your dick into an underage girl under any circumstances, is rape.  okay?  its not sex.  and its not prostitution, which allegedly deals in sex.  this is not sex, from the perspective of the victim.  and the only way this could be “sex” to anyone, is if “sex” is used INTERCHANGEABLY with “stuck his dick into.”  there is no other reasonable interpretation of this word, as used.

and being that this is the case, under the current sexual regime, women and girls are in the position of the pool-toy.

28 Responses to “Mainstream News Outlet Confuses “Sex” and “Stuck His Dick Into””

  1. Oh yes!

    that sticking your dick into an underage girl under any circumstances, is rape.  okay?  its not sex.  and its not prostitution, which allegedly deals in sex.  this is not sex, from the perspective of the victim.  and the only way this could be “sex” to anyone, is if “sex” is used INTERCHANGEABLY with “stuck his dick into.” 

    From the MALE PERSPECTIVE. always.

    Youth seems to be the ONLY limit many sex-positive people will acknowledge as valid. Mainly because its illegal, I think. And yet even the abject horror of organized rape of GIRLS is being eroded with the language of these “news” sources:

    “forced prostitution” of underage girls.  can we think about this one for a minute?  what is cnn saying here: that prostitution is okay, as long as its not “forced”?  clearly, this is exactly what they are saying,

    That is exactly what they’re saying. They’re saying that children are doing “sex work,” a sex-based economic and physical abuse disguised as something females CHOOSE cuz we like it and it’s empowering!1!!1! What the fuck is going on?? That’s what feminists need to be asking.

  2. yes, god forbid an allegedly “neutral” news source make a value judgement (COUGH COUGH) about pornstitution or trafficking in women and girls for the purpose of victimizing them with sexualized violence. that wouldnt be LIBERAL now would it?

    clearly of course, they *are* making value judgements here about pornstitution and about PIV too, when they dress it up in “consent” rhetoric and refuse to call it what it clearly is, even when its done to female children. they are saying its fine.

  3. Yes, these ARE value judgments. This is a very specific FRAMING of FACTS that reports them from the male perspective. None of this is SEX. It’s rape. And slavery. Rape slavery.

  4. Yes, sex to men (porn, prostitution, rape) is not sex to women, so how can it be consensual?
    Women agree to men’s version of ‘what sex is’ through attrition; and we call it consent!

  5. Child rape, statutory rape… raping children… not having sex with. The word is rape, and anytime men force women into this…girls or women it is rape. And “forced” is what it is. Thomas Jefferson and Sally Hemings… statutory rape. The founding fathers raped black women slaves, and so no wonder men always want to cover their tracks with words like “have sex with.”
    Everything they do is rape in the case of children, but again, have sex with is how men see PIV always.

    We need to write letters to CNN and Huffpo… especially since Arianna Huffington claims to be feminist.

  6. a letter writing campaign, started by HUB readers? sounds good to me! 🙂 i dont think ariana huffington is affiliated with huff po anymore though. not that it really matters. i am sure shes not a rad fem in any case. lib fem all the way, is my guess, and probably wouldnt even blink at any of this. its all sex-poz and pro-pornstitution afterall. the lib fem and progressive party line.

  7. Brilliant. Post. Another phrase much used in underage rape is sexual assault, though this is being used less because it does equate sticking dick into with an abusive act. The reporting of the Polanski case often cited sexual assault.

    this is certainly a value judgement. Sex should never be equated with sticking dick into, rape and rape slavery (forced prostitution my eye).

    And yeah since when did sticking a dick into an inaminate object become sex? Man has sex with bicycle (true headline) which means men ‘having sex’ viewing women as objects too? Am I right?

  8. And yeah since when did sticking a dick into an inaminate object become sex? Man has sex with bicycle (true headline) which means men ‘having sex’ viewing women as objects too? Am I right?

    yes, thats exactly what this means. women are THIS objectified, we are in EXACTLY the same position under this PIV-centric discourse as an inflatable pool-toy (or a bicycle) that men “have sex with” i mean stick their dicks into. this is how bad it is. i hope that was completely clear.

  9. HELL YES! Woman = inflatable doll = dog = hole in the wall. If a man sticks his dick into it, that’s SEX.

    Tangentially, this is related to why it’s so difficult for SOME people to understand the concept of LESBIAN sex. No penis, no SEX, right?? Like, what do women DO?? So they fail to take lesbianism seriously. And in some cases, they refuse to perceive female-on-female sexuality as CHEATING in the context of monogamous heterosexuality. /end lesbian tangent

  10. HA! its not a tangent UP, its true. and it makes sense, if women are as objectified by the PIV paradigm as A FUCKING RUBBER RAFT (and i believe i have shown here that they are) then both women and men are going to recognize an objectification/dick receptacle scenario as “sex” and nothing else as “sex”. this is where female objectification becomes sex, where it becomes masochistic for women to participate in it at all, although i agree with those who find “masochism” an imperfect description of what this is. its participating in normalized and invisibilized sadism, and normalized and invisibilized objectification, which isnt the same as masochism is it?

    and as for cheating, well, if “sex” puts women at risk for pregnancy and disease (and it does) then no, cheating with a lesbian really isnt cheating becasue its not really sex. its amazing what we consider to be “sex”. sex literally *is* putting women at risk and objectifying them. when you take that away, theres nothing left thats recognizable to most people. the facts of womens objectification and the physical danger there for women is something that must be “felt” and realized at a deep level i think. thats what i hope we are getting at with these discussions, and its somethign thats not available when reading “intercourse” for example. even though dworkin was a brilliant and graphic writer, its very hard to convey all of this so that it makes sense to other people. its not the fault of any author who cant get this across, its an herculean task for all the barriers to understanding and feeling this one, in particular. i think the rubber pool toy here does the trick, and discussing it with others who all state it slightly differently. objectification is HUGE but its deep meaning for women and for “sex” is elusive at the same time.

  11. RIGHT. (thanks!) What *exactly* does a penis bring/offer that is so CORE to our understanding of “sex,” that in its absence, SEX no longer happens?? I mean, people scoff at lesbian use of dildos too. Penetration is not the point. We are using deductive reasoning, of course, but I think that examining the ways in which we do OR DO NOT validate an exchange as “sex” reveals that domination+objectification(+female harm) is inherent to our understanding of the concept.

  12. Naming is so important. In Seattle they’ve finally begun calling prostitution the child rape trade. People are still uncomfortable with those words, but they do get to the heart of the matter. It’s not “underage prostitution”, it’s trafficking in the rape of children. Since changing the term we use, there’s been a change in attitude.

    Indeed, the word “sex,” is completely male defined and male centered. It means he enjoyed putting his dick in something, even a swimming pool. We used to have a prosecutor who could never quite get his English right who would make us laugh because he always unintentionally told the truth. He’d ask questions like, “Did you put the P in the V and have sex with yourself?” or “did you have sexual relations “on” her?” He could never quite get the words right and always implied the guy was having sex with himself, which actually is a pretty accurate description of many “sex” acts.

  13. Yes that male prosecutor who inadvertently always stated the truth was correct every time. Now repeat after me MSN, Huff Po and all the other innumerable malestream media – child rape trade exists it is not human trafficking or forced trafficking. Males who rape women/girls/female babies are ‘doing sexual acts on female.’ Likewise prostitution is prostitution not forced because murder is never murder is it – it is just one person(s) killed.

    The trade men profit from and believe is their innate right is trafficking women into sexual slavery not ‘sex trade’ because last time I checked men were not being sexually enslaved and forced to submit to innumerable penises being thrust into their dainty bodies.

    Lastly male masturbated into inanimate object not ‘had sex.’

  14. haha! oh noes, look out huffpo. UP is on the case.

  15. Oh yeah, I WRITE LETTERS. And then people get MAD. I even know how to use scribd now. LOOK OUT, world! UP has complaining to do and her sights have been set. 😀

  16. Yes, I believe this letter writing will get somewhere. The girl rape trade, pay to rape = prostitution.
    Getting the word out there, and putting it in people’s faces will end the mystification of the rape of girls, and the rape of all women who are forced (by a variety of means) into PIV. Drunk women, men using alcohol to pretend that consent isn’t consent… frat houses even allowed to have beer busts after their members have been accused of raping women.

    The girl rape trade, rape for hire…. and people don’t rape, and sexual assault is even a coded word too.

    And oh, Bill Clinton didn’t have sex with “that woman” because in his mind it wasn’t PIV, and that’s no joke, he really thinks of sex that way.

    I’m not giving up on Arianna Huffington BTW, because I believe she is a decent and caring woman.

  17. Men seem to see everything they do as sex: war, capitalism, fighting, war, exploiting other people, war, fighting… Well, it always has sexual connotation because everything they are has to be according to something else underneath them, and that something in order to be underneath must be feminised and therefore constructed as penetrated – the lowest of the lowest state of being in patriarchy.

    All patriarchy is rape.

  18. “stick his dick into” is the founding paradigm of patriarchy. Everything men created within and for patriarchy is based and built upon this principle.
    Patriarchy, otherwise called men’s mega tantrum – when they discovered (thought) they were useless in the process of life creation – so became the centre of the world by sticking their holy sacred scepters wherever and whenever they could.

  19. mens mega-tantrum. HA! indeed! where the sun rises and sets in their assholes, and even when they lose, they win.

    UP i fully support your letter writing! yay! 🙂 although i am *never* optimistic about the outcomes there. dont mind me though. DOOOO IT!!!!! speaking of letter writing, patriarchywatch recently wrote to PETA about their “treatment” of women and she received back the most long winded, wrongheaded, assholic response EVAR. really, it has to be in the top 5 or something of condescending wrongheaded liberal dickwad mansplanations. or at least top 5 of the ones ive seen recently. with our sweet FAAB-only policies around here, we dont see a lot of them which i LOVE.

    http://patriarchywatch.wordpress.com/2011/08/31/response-from-peta/

  20. Yes, sex to men (porn, prostitution, rape) is not sex to women, so how can it be consensual?
    Women agree to men’s version of ‘what sex is’ through attrition; and we call it consent!

    Really important statement, Zeph. Information about what sex is or could be is kept from girls beginning at birth. Other information is substituted instead. One way is through the uses of the word “sex” described here.

  21. I’m fed up with prostitution being called ‘sex’. No wonder very few rapes of non-prostituted womyn end up in conviction when the case of those who get serially raped (in pornstitution) on a daily basis is not even recognised as crime…

    I’m also really, really fed up with “stick his dick into” being culturally seen as almost the only form of sex or so-called “pleasure” for womyn. No wonder many womyn do not see real lesbianism (that does not include ‘dildo’ culture) as a viable potion for love or sex. It is actually better than this whole patriarchal mindfucking PIV, etc, but they have been thoroughly brainwashed not to think so. Sad…

  22. ((( Maggie ))) I love your comment. I so often think the same thing.

  23. Sorry for the typo. I meant to write a viable option for love and sex, not a “viable potion.”

    Thanks, Mary. 🙂

  24. Genius, Maggie! “Lesbianism as a viable potion for love and sex!” That says it all!!!!!! 😀

Trackbacks

%d bloggers like this: